<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosetta Stone to Online Video Counters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hragvartanian.com/2007/06/27/rosetta-stone-to-online-video-counters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2007/06/27/rosetta-stone-to-online-video-counters/</link>
	<description>A blog of art, culture, photography, writing and ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rotblat</title>
		<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2007/06/27/rosetta-stone-to-online-video-counters/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rotblat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 04:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hragvartanian.com/?p=352#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Hi Hrag, it&#039;s me again.  I&#039;m back to let you know that we&#039;ve added a great new universal upload and tracking tool - Load &amp; Track.  Now you can syndicate your videos to the top sites, and they are automatically integrated into our tracking analytics.  Let me know what you think!  Our alpha users saw over 3x more views by using the tool.
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hrag, it&#8217;s me again.  I&#8217;m back to let you know that we&#8217;ve added a great new universal upload and tracking tool &#8211; Load &amp; Track.  Now you can syndicate your videos to the top sites, and they are automatically integrated into our tracking analytics.  Let me know what you think!  Our alpha users saw over 3x more views by using the tool.<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rotblat</title>
		<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2007/06/27/rosetta-stone-to-online-video-counters/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rotblat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hragvartanian.com/?p=352#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, Hrag.  This is Mark from TubeMogul, and I want to note that while our study found Revver and AOL to be the least stringent on counting views, we&#039;re not scolding them for it, by any means.  Revver has some great metrics in their API that other sites don&#039;t have (completions, for example), and overall, being the most strict might not always be the best means of counting, either, as I might watch a video several times, show it to friends on my computer, and these are all impressions.  There simply aren&#039;t any standards yet, and we want to open up the dialog because we think putting standards in place is critical to priming the pump for advertising dollars in online video.
Best,
Mark
mark at tubemogul.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Hrag.  This is Mark from TubeMogul, and I want to note that while our study found Revver and AOL to be the least stringent on counting views, we&#8217;re not scolding them for it, by any means.  Revver has some great metrics in their API that other sites don&#8217;t have (completions, for example), and overall, being the most strict might not always be the best means of counting, either, as I might watch a video several times, show it to friends on my computer, and these are all impressions.  There simply aren&#8217;t any standards yet, and we want to open up the dialog because we think putting standards in place is critical to priming the pump for advertising dollars in online video.<br />
Best,<br />
Mark<br />
mark at tubemogul.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
