<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Origins of the Aesthetics of Devastation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hragvartanian.com/2008/05/31/aesthetics-of-devastation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2008/05/31/aesthetics-of-devastation/</link>
	<description>art, culture, photography, writing, ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hv</title>
		<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2008/05/31/aesthetics-of-devastation/comment-page-1/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>hv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hragvartanian.com/?p=1081#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>I can post the article if you like (let me know)...but I believe Ashton is referring to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Tinguely&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jean Tinguely&lt;/a&gt; and his self-destroying sculpture titled &quot;Homage to New York&quot; (1960).

The big difference between Speer and the aesthetics of devastation (from what I can see) is that there is no sense of nostalgia involved. This new aesthetic is actually unmonumental (remember that was the name of the New Museum&#039;s inaugural show which featured many works in this vein) which would be in contrast to Speer and his obsession with monumentality and architectural gigantism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can post the article if you like (let me know)&#8230;but I believe Ashton is referring to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Tinguely" rel="nofollow">Jean Tinguely</a> and his self-destroying sculpture titled &#8220;Homage to New York&#8221; (1960).</p>
<p>The big difference between Speer and the aesthetics of devastation (from what I can see) is that there is no sense of nostalgia involved. This new aesthetic is actually unmonumental (remember that was the name of the New Museum&#8217;s inaugural show which featured many works in this vein) which would be in contrast to Speer and his obsession with monumentality and architectural gigantism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://hragvartanian.com/2008/05/31/aesthetics-of-devastation/comment-page-1/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hragvartanian.com/?p=1081#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t find an online version of the Dore Ashton essay mentioned, but if you know of a link that would be helpful in fleshing out &quot;distracted and frantically bizarre,&quot; production, that  would be helpful.

The aesthetics of devastation reminds me of the aesthetics of ruins, infamously conceptualized by Albert Speer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruin_value

(strangely relates to Creative Time&#039;s Tribute in Light)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find an online version of the Dore Ashton essay mentioned, but if you know of a link that would be helpful in fleshing out &#8220;distracted and frantically bizarre,&#8221; production, that  would be helpful.</p>
<p>The aesthetics of devastation reminds me of the aesthetics of ruins, infamously conceptualized by Albert Speer:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruin_value" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruin_value</a></p>
<p>(strangely relates to Creative Time&#8217;s Tribute in Light)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

