Hrag Vartanian

Via the New York Sun:

One of the main artworks in the Museum of Modern Art’s current exhibition, “Design and the Elastic Mind” — a tiny jacket composed of embryonic stem cells taken from mice — has died, the Art Newspaper reported yesterday.

The piece, “Victimless Leather” by Oron Catts and Ionat Zurr, was designed to remain “living” throughout the exhibition, which opened February 24 and runs through May 12. The collection of stem cells was fed nutrients by tube, but expanded too quickly and clogged its own incubation system within five weeks of the exhibition’s opening.

The head of MoMA’s architecture and design department and curator of the show, Paola Antonelli, had to turn off the life-support system for the work, essentially “killing” it. But the decision wasn’t easy. “I’ve always been pro-choice and all of a sudden I’m here not sleeping at night about killing a coat,” she told the paper.

So, how is this different from the supposed abortion art at Yale? I never had an issue with the student who wanted to induce herbal abortions on herself as part of her project (though I personally think that if it was proven to be true she should have been given a psychological evaluation before she was allowed to proceed with it as part of Yale’s program) but others did. I assume it’s good ol’ fashioned speciesism at work.

To their credit, the Art Newspaper piece does hint at the double-standard:

Catts says his intention is “to raise questions about our exploitation of other living beings”. (source)

A pic of “Victimless Leather” via jenadactyl’s Flickrstream.

Jeffrey Feldman (aka Frameshop) came up with an inventive way to launch his new book:

Frameshop: NEW BOOK LAUNCHES TODAY!!

Today we have a guest, Jennifer Cody Epstein, whose new book, The Painter from Shanghai, is a fascinating fictionalized account of the life and times Pan Yuliang, a prostitute who became one of the first truly modern artists in China.

The ultimate underdog, Xiuquing was orphaned at a young age and later sold into prostitution by her uncle. Renamed Yuliang, she excells at the sex trade, becomes the lover of a customs inspector, enrolls in the Shanghai Art Academy and even travels to Europe to study art! This is an amazing tale with endless twists.

I’ve already started reading the book and will report back when I finish. But in the meantime, I asked Jennifer to write a little about this unorthodox artist (though I guess all artists are) and why she decided to tackle such a complex and mysterious character for her first novel.

Painting Yuliang

Ten years ago, when I still thought my first novel would be the prerequisite autobiographical coming-of-age saga, my husband and I went to a show of modern Chinese art at the Guggenheim. It was there that I saw my first Pan Yuliang painting: lush and Cezanne-esque, it fascinated me. Particularly Pan’s face—so sad and wistful against her Parisian window scene. When I read the accompanying biography my jaw dropped.

“Look,” I exclaimed. “Look at this AMAZING woman.”

My husband Michael—a filmmaker with a good eye for plot and image—took Pan’s image and her stunning lifeline (prostitute-turned-concubine-turned-post-Impressionist-icon) in. Then he turned to me.

“This,” he announced, with characteristic certainty, “is your first novel.”

“You’re crazy,” I told him.

And I really thought he was. It was true that I had Masters in international relations; that I’d lived in Japan and China. But I knew nothing about Asian art, or even about art in general. And I’d only started seriously writing fiction. Not even good fiction.

And yet in coming months, what had seemed a startling proposal slowly took root; I started seeking out pieces of Pan’s life and work like the parts to some enormous puzzle. In some ways, the more I learned the more daunted I became. And yet, I was also strongly drawn to Pan’s story. While dire, reality-defying, even shocking at points, it was also a universal tale of a fellow artist, finding her way. This was a process I—a struggling and largely unformed writer myself—desperately wanted to understand: how does one become an artist? How do you overcome the innumerable discouragements and hurdles (in my case mundane, in Pan’s catastrophic) and create?

I found both my answer and inspiration, in part, in Pan Yuliang’s own work: the gorgeous and defiantly Western images (often nude, often herself nude) that had so shocked her countrymen in the last century. The images—whether lush pears or lithely curved female bodies—spoke to unrepentant fascination with beauty; with female strength; with sexuality. with the often-fuzzy lines that delineate culture, nationality, morality. If her somber self-portraits (in only one I’ve seen is she actually, openly smiling) gave me a clue to her temperment, her vibrant palette and fanciful blendings of post-Impressionism and guohua (traditional Chinese watercolors) granted insight into her dreams, longings, her unique artistic eye. Or at least, so I liked to think. At any rate, there wasn’t much else to go on: little is known about Pan’s true story, even in China.

In some ways, then, Pan’s own brush was the strongest source I had. It helped me hear her voice (vibrant, rich, defiant, sad) and feel her passion, her singular determination to reach her goals. And in the end, it inspired me in my own (perhaps wildly over-ambitious) goal, of showcasing her life in words with just as much flair as she did on canvas. Though—truth be told—if the The Painter from Shanghai does nothing more than shine a light on an astonishing woman and her lovely, forgotten artwork, I’ll feel I’ve painted at least an adequate picture.

In the end, my goal in writing The Painter from Shanghai was to showcase Pan’s life in words as she perhaps might have on canvas: with beauty, drama, a hint of darkness, a lush love of form and color. The jury is still out on whether I’ve achieved that; but so far the novel’s reception has—happily—been positive: the New York Times called it “luminous” and “vivid;” Publishers Weekly and Library Journal both gave it starred reviews, and the South China Post called it “refreshing,” “authentic,” “like a cross between Zhang Yimou’s movies and Chen Yifei’s oil paintings”—praise that Pan Yuliang herself, perhaps, might have appreciated.

-Jennifer Cody Epstein

I personally think this story would make an incredible film and for all those Hollywood producers out there I’ll mention that Oscar has a thing for hookers since in 2003, Charlize Theron was the 10th actress to win an Oscar for playing a prostitute in Monster. Her predecessors were Anne Baxter in The Razor’s Edge (1946); Claire Trevor in Key Largo (1948); Donna Reed in From Here to Eternity (1953); Jo Van Fleet in East of Eden (1955), Dorothy Malone in Written on the Wind (1956), Elizabeth Taylor in Butterfield 8 (1960), Jane Fonda in Klute (1971), and Mira Sorvino in Mighty Aphrodite (1995)….I’m just sayin’.

Here are some of Pan’s paintings, most of her known works are at Anhui Provincial Museum in Beijing, China.

[Read more →]

First that shitty French label donated money to Homeland Security during the Brooklyn Museum opening and now they’re suing artist/designer Nadia Plesner for showing {via Eyeteeth}:

“the likeness of a Vuitton bag in a campaign to encourage divestment from Darfur. As a Vuitton lawyer claims in a February cease-and-desist letter, the bag pictured is the Monogram Multicolore, created by Vuitton art director Marc Jacobs and artist Takashi Murakami.”

The artist responded to Vuitton’s letter saying:

“Sometimes recognizable objects are needed to express deeper meanings, and in their new form become more than the objects themselves — they become art.”

A-FUCKIN’-MEN!

God, Vuitton pisses me off and to be honest Murakami looks like an asshole too. I understand they are trying to protect their brand but it’s an art work for chrissake…and one raising money for Darfur no less!

If you want to piss LV off, consider buying one of Plesner’s fundraising t-shirts or posters here.

So what’s next? Paris Hilton suing Plesner for depicting her signature dog in the image?

If you want to laugh read the comments on this post at Techdirt.

This was too good not to share:

Things I have learned during this campaign season:

• In a race that includes a former First Lady of the United States and a multimillionaire Republican senator rumored to share up to eight residences with his wife, the black guy from Chicago is unforgivably elitist.
• Racism in America is caused primarily by black Chicago preachers.
• The guy who keeps getting confused over the relationship between Iraq, Iran, and al Qaeda is the foreign policy expert.
• The guy who goes to campaign stops on his wife’s private jet aircraft is the most down-to-earth.
• People in the heartland don’t like it when you call them bitter, but they do like it when you explain to them that they’re too dumb to understand issues more important than whether or not they like to be called bitter.

Check out the rest over at DailyKos.