French Kissing Mao: Chinese Art Smackdown

Beijing/Bushwick resident (one of the best hybrids I’ve yet encountered) Ellen Pearlman takes on The New Republic‘s Jed Perl (“Mao Crazy“) in an article published in the Brooklyn Rail that offers some good insight into new Chinese art.

Best part:

Artists readily acknowledge their superior ability to imitate and appropriate (think well-made Chinese knockoffs or Murakami Vuitton bags) but the warp speed at which this appropriation and synthesis will ultimately create new forms in China could make the fin-de-siècle displays at this year’s Whitney Biennial and New Museum shows look like a last gasp for America’s world domination. And if Mr. Perl has any doubts about appropriation, he should look in his own back yard at the work of Richard Prince. It’s already a dead argument.

The whole article here.

Though I think Ellen overlooks what one of the primary issues with the new Chinese art is, namely human rights, not aesthetics. If Chinese artists had a more critical stance towards the Chinese government’s human rights lunacy some of us would be able to stomach the art more…but until that day, it just feels like they are PR agents of a corrupt and dangerous regime.

One response to “French Kissing Mao: Chinese Art Smackdown”

  1. […] Interesting essay about contemporary Chinese art: Ellen Pearlman of the Brooklyn Rail takes on Jed Perl of the New Republic. (Via Hrag.) […]

Leave a Reply

Latest Posts

A Historic Year of Protests
This past year saw a huge groundswell of support for protests, most notably for Black Lives Matter. Protests for Palestine, Artsakh, and Pride were also some of the other campaigns …
The T**** Presidential Library
(2021) My only question is if hardcore MAGA supporters would hurl themselves into the hole at a certain age, like something out of Logan's Run (1976), as a sign of …
My First Therapist
I took this photograph while leaving my first therapist's office. It was my last appointment. I went to her for 11 years. The first stretch lasted six years, then I …